Politics in Kano has always been a contact sport disguised as ideology. The defection of Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf from the New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP) to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) is therefore less a moral tragedy than a familiar ritual: the periodic shedding of political skins in pursuit of survival. Yet the event has been dressed in the theatrical language of treachery, complete with Senator Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso’s declaration of “World Betrayal Day”. One suspects that what truly hurts is not the breach of loyalty, but the loss of leverage.
At first glance, the arithmetic looks brutal. Yusuf did not defect alone. He carried with him a small parliament: nine federal legislators, over thirty members of the Kano State House of Assembly and most local government chairmen. He arrived at the APC’s doorstep not as a refugee but as a conquering general, promptly rewarded with what Nigerian politics cherishes most; an anointed ticket for re-election in 2027. The APC, always eager to turn opposition implosions into governing capital, quickly arranged a show of unity. Aspirants withdrew. Deputy Senate President Barau Jibrin discovered humility. Ganduje, once dethroned by Kwankwaso’s political machine, returned to the center of Kano’s political chessboard.
For Kwankwaso, this is the most serious challenge since he clawed back control of Kano in 2023 under the NNPP’s improbable banner. His movement, Kwankwasiyya, was built not as a party structure but as a personal political franchise: red caps, populist rhetoric and a reputation for grassroots mobilization. It worked spectacularly; until it didn’t. Since then, defections have become routine. Senator Kawu Sumaila left. House of Representatives members followed. Now the governor himself has crossed the floor, citing the well-worn Nigerian excuse of “alignment with the center” to bring development, a phrase that usually translates into access to federal patronage.
It is tempting, therefore, to write Kwankwaso’s political obituary. This would be premature, and characteristically Nigerian in its impatience. First, Kano’s political history is littered with defectors who discovered that crossing the river does not always mean reaching dry land. Abubakar Rimi’s famous break with Aminu Kano in the Second Republic did not end well. Ganduje himself once learnt that yesterday’s godfather can become today’s most dangerous rival. Kano voters have a stubborn habit of separating party label from political personality. They may forgive a defection; they rarely forget who built their political identity.
Kwankwaso’s greatest asset has never been the NNPP’s letterhead. It is the emotional loyalty of a large segment of Kano’s urban poor and youth, cultivated over decades through patronage networks, symbolism and a narrative of progressive resistance. That network has been wounded, not destroyed. The refusal of Yusuf’s deputy and some commissioners to defect is politically minor in arithmetic terms, but symbolically important. It signals that Kwankwasiyya still has foot soldiers willing to endure political winter for ideological, or at least factional purity.
Second, Yusuf’s defection, though executed from a position of strength, also carries risks. He now governs Kano with an expanded coalition that includes former enemies, ambitious allies on temporary sabbatical and Abuja power brokers with short attention spans. The unity displayed at his reception into the APC is tactical, not philosophical. It is easy to chant “4+4” in January; it is harder to share spoils in election season. Kano APC is notorious for internal warfare, and Yusuf has entered it not as a natural leader but as a newly adopted heir. His promised automatic ticket is a political mortgage whose interest will be paid in concessions, appointments and compromised autonomy.
Third, Kwankwaso’s national relevance complicates the local arithmetic. He remains one of the few northern politicians with recognizable personal branding outside his state. In 2023, he did not win the presidency, but he demonstrated that a regional platform could disrupt the traditional two-party duopoly. For 2027, his value lies less in winning outright and more in bargaining. Even rumors of his potential alignment - whether with the APC, a reconstituted opposition bloc or a revived third force -carry strategic weight. The fact that Governor Yusuf reportedly asked President Tinubu to negotiate with Kwankwaso tells its own story: one does not seek reconciliation with irrelevant men. Critics argue that Kwankwaso’s rigidity, including alleged demands about future presidential concessions, shows political delusion. Perhaps. But Nigerian politics rewards audacity almost as much as realism. Kwankwaso’s bargaining style has always been maximalist. It has also, inconveniently for his enemies, often worked.
For the NNPP, however, the outlook is less romantic. The party is visibly fractured, entangled in leadership disputes and legal quarrels. Without Kwankwaso, it is an empty shell; without Kano, it risks becoming a footnote. Rebuilding it into a credible electoral platform before 2027 will require more than loyalty speeches at Miller Road. It will require candidates with local legitimacy, disciplined organization and money—three commodities in short supply outside government.
Yet politics rarely obeys linear logic. Yusuf’s governance performance will now be scrutinized through the unforgiving lens reserved for defectors. Any stumble; salary delays, infrastructure failures, security lapses, will be attributed not to administrative complexity but to political karma. Kwankwaso, for his part, thrives in opposition. He is most effective when wounded, rhetorically indignant and unburdened by executive responsibility.
What does all this mean for 2027? Kano is likely to become a high-stakes battleground rather than an APC coronation ground. Yusuf has advantages: incumbency, federal backing and a formidable coalition. Kwankwaso has the advantages of narrative, mobilization and the unpredictable volatility of protest votes. Nationally, Kwankwaso remains a useful spoiler, a potential kingmaker and an inconvenient reminder that northern politics is not monolithic.
Writing him off now would be an exercise in lazy arithmetic. Kano politics is not decided by headcounts alone; it is shaped by memory, emotion and the enduring Nigerian fascination with political comebacks. Kwankwaso has been declared finished before. He has made a habit of returning. Whether he will do so again is uncertain. But to assume he cannot is wishful thinking dressed as political realism.
 |
|
